Lenovo 114155U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 114155U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 114155U
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130807
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 12 '17 at 21:39
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2310M-$80
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Memory 55.8
1-Core 10.9
2-Core 53.5
27% 40.1 Pts
4-Core 34.8
8-Core 69.8
6% 52.3 Pts
64-Core 101
6% 101 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21E2) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
1.37% Terrible
Lighting 1.57
Reflection 2.35
Parallax 1.03
1% 1.65 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 2.87
2% 1.75 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.37%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 60GB
38GB free
Firmware: S9FM02.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 364
Write 163
Mixed 171
51% 233 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 4.99
52% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 45.4
DQ Mixed 3.74
12% 25 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 75%
Hitachi HTS723232A7A364 320GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EC2ZB70B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 78.2
Write 77.2
Mixed 70
56% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.26
67% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HMT351S6AFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.5% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 7.8
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 1
5% 1.8 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback