| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 20.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P6X58D-E (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110510 |
| Uptime | 25.7 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 09 '20 at 20:26 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.4%
Good
|
66% 110 Pts
|
38% 312 Pts
|
22% 364 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
EVGA(3842 1570) 1.2GB
CLim: 732 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35
|
20.5%
Poor
|
20% 30.5 fps
|
22% 27.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 94 106 118 118 MB/s
|
29.8%
Poor
|
37% 167 MB/s
|
36% 8.63 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 133 134 142 148 143 MB/s
|
76.8%
Very good
|
76% 105 MB/s
|
123% 0.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 6 slots used
32GB DIMM
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.5%
Below average
|
31% 11 GB/s
|
27% 9.3 GB/s
|
58% 69 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,351 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 496x |
| Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 198x |
| Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 145x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 74x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 74x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 68x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $289 |