Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80E1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemLenovo 80E1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 4B2
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140826
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 11 '20 at 00:01
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-6010 APU R2 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
27.5% Poor
Memory 48.4
1-Core 19.8
2-Core 38.3
25% 35.5 Pts
4-Core 40.5
8-Core 38.7
5% 39.6 Pts
64-Core 38.5
2% 38.5 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3801) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.352.1013.1001
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.31% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 3.19
Parallax 1.59
1% 2.04 fps
MRender 2.57
Gravity 1.07
Splatting 2.57
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.31%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD2500LPCX-24C6HT0 250GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.8 7.4 8.7 8.3 7.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 57%
Disque virtuel Microsoft 43GB
18GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 64 68 66 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 7.8
Write 75.1
Mixed 11.8
SusWrite 60.4
28% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
39% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80E1 Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback