Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190715
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '20 at 13:26
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	92% Outstanding	Memory 92.2 1-Core 128 2-Core 252 88% 157 Pts	4-Core 495 8-Core 707 75% 601 Pts	64-Core 720 45% 720 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 341B) CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.2 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.6% Average	Lighting 51.7 Reflection 64.4 Parallax 68.6 42% 61.6 fps	MRender 65.6 Gravity 52.4 Splatting 54.2 47% 57.4 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 67 29 27 12 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Read 394 Write 304 Mixed 149 SusWrite 58 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 9.5 4K Write 25.2 4K Mixed 10.5 41% 15.1 MB/s	DQ Read 89.7 DQ Write 74.5 DQ Mixed 32.8 38% 65.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 564GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 6.9 18 18 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 15GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 3.4 4.6 4 4.3 4.5 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 33 Write 4 Mixed 12 SusWrite 4.2 14% 13.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.6 109% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB 2,046 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	MC Read 34.1 MC Write 34.5 MC Mixed 24.6 89% 31.1 GB/s	SC Read 19.1 SC Write 35.2 SC Mixed 26.8 77% 27 GB/s	Latency 63.7 63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	1,616x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,217x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	177x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	832x
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	481x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	429x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	297x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	218x
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples	142x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	361x
D12.2356WS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 81%, 464 samples	171x
D12.2324CS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 80%, 469 samples	162x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $438

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16