Asus P5KPL-VM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-VM  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1176 x 664 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '20 at 23:06
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5450-$195
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 43
2-Core 84.4
43% 66.6 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 170
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 8490) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 340.52
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.67% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 0.85
Parallax 0.47
1% 0.74 fps
MRender 0.67
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 0.52
0% 0.69 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.67%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor 6L300R0 300GB-$46
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BAJ41G20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 23 24 27 32 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 24.5
Write 46.8
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 27.4
23% 31 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.1
127% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 34%
USB FLASH DRIVE 2GB
1GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 9.2 10 10 11 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
7.65% Terrible
Read 23.5
Write 9.8
Mixed 12.1
SusWrite 9.8
17% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
37% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.65%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
21.2% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.73 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 5.6
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KPL-VM Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback