Asus GL553VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus GL553VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL553VD
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180102
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 19 '20 at 13:57
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 207
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 399
53% 398 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 15E0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.42% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 25.1
Parallax 6.84
5% 12.8 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 14
9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.42%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1764 936 795 799 798 800 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 2,402
Write 1,780
Mixed 1,166
SusWrite 982
352% 1,582 MB/s
4K Read 63.1
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 83.3
278% 96.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,029
DQ Write 876
DQ Mixed 957
716% 954 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 285%
Great: 346%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
864GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 126 124 128 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 81.6
Write 124
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 124
71% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.7
196% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.C8FN Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78.5% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 23.5
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 22.5
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL553VD Builds (Compare 4,007 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL553VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback