Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Dixonsxp G33M05 (all builds)
Motherboard	DIXONSXP G33M05
Memory	0.3 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070917
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '20 at 17:15
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$50 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	41.2% Average	Memory 66.2 1-Core 26.8 2-Core 55.2 34% 49.4 Pts	4-Core 99.1 8-Core 85.1 13% 92.1 Pts	64-Core 91.7 6% 91.7 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450 32,407 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 03DA) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.74% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 3.42 Parallax 2 2% 2.57 fps	MRender 1.76 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 1.87 2% 1.78 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.74% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$35 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 388GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 31 9.5 12 22 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	37% Below average	Read 109 Write 28.6 Mixed 54 SusWrite 20 39% 52.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 70%
Hitachi HDS728080PLA380 82GB-$33 2,259 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 76GB free Firmware: PF2OA60A SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 56 55 56 56 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	Read 54.6 Write 53 Mixed 38.4 SusWrite 56 37% 50.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 32%
Jmicron Corp. 250GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 76GB free, PID 2509 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 29 Write 26.8 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 19.9 34% 25.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 73%
Hitachi HTS541612J9SA00 120GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 108GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 34.5 Write 25.7 Mixed 18.9 SusWrite 20.9 32% 25 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x1GB 7,767 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 3 of 4 slots used 3GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 3.5 11% 3.93 GB/s	SC Read 1.3 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 0.3 3% 1.03 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Dixonsxp G33M05

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)