MSI A320M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B84
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84)  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190130
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateOct 30 '20 at 15:29
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 189
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 405
56% 414 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 80 42 68 50 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 64
Write 361
Mixed 117
SusWrite 82.3
36% 156 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 37.6
138% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 147
127% 188 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 86%
Seagate ST3320820AS 309GB
107GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 67.2
Write 21.5
Mixed 42.5
33% 43.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 41%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
15GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
4.15% Terrible
Read 12.3
Write 7.5
Mixed 11.8
SusWrite 7.4
13% 9.75 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.15%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3E1 Kingston KHX2666C16/8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 29.2
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 31.1
SC Mixed 22.5
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84) Builds (Compare 580 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback