Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory114.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateNov 01 '20 at 02:01
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$262
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 78.1
1-Core 153
2-Core 305
95% 179 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 1,170
105% 887 Pts
64-Core 2,134
132% 2,134 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Lighting 70.2
Reflection 71.3
Parallax 87.2
57% 76.3 fps
MRender 71.4
Gravity 69.8
Splatting 57.8
53% 66.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
691GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1531 909 947 952 950 943 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 1,908
Write 2,774
Mixed 1,980
SusWrite 1,039
435% 1,925 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 69.8
223% 78.9 MB/s
DQ Read 947
DQ Write 1,130
DQ Mixed 982
756% 1,019 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 256%
Great: 486%
WDC WD10 03FZEX-00K3CA0 1TB
921GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 31 31 31 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.9% Poor
Read 38.7
Write 36.8
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 30.7
47% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
138% 1.73 MB/s
EPSON Storage 1GB
1GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
1.55% Terrible
Read 4.7
Write 2.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.1
4% 3.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.55%
Great: 3%
WDC WD10 03FZEX-00MK2A0 1TB
536GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.8 3.9 3.9 3.8 3.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.4% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 35.2
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 3.8
33% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
134% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GTZR 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 43.8
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 38.6
114% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 38.5
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 108%
Great: 182%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,071 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,388
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback