Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-HD3  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '17 at 11:05
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 57.4
2-Core 116
49% 80.8 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 192
26% 191 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.4.2
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.9% Average
Lighting 50.2
Reflection 56.4
Parallax 64.7
41% 57.1 fps
MRender 55.1
Gravity 52.4
Splatting 70.7
50% 59.4 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team L7 EVO SSD 240GB
180GB free
Firmware: V2.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 456
Write 366
Mixed 423
92% 415 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 2.21
60% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 3.61
32% 73.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 69%
Adata XPG SX900 128GB-$103
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.7a Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 443
Write 158
Mixed 239
61% 280 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 6.99
70% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 18.5
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 34.2
39% 63 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 82%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 2.5TB
659GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
94.6% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 164
Mixed 152
121% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.19
88% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
23.9% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.83 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 7.3
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-HD3 Builds (Compare 173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-HD3 - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $251
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback