Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics72.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 EVO  (all builds)
Memory20.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '20 at 16:39
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$173
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 80
2-Core 140
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 458
44% 362 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Nvidia(10DE 2182) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.5% Very good
Lighting 89
Reflection 79.2
Parallax 68.7
72% 78.9 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 88.8
Splatting 76
72% 90.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 3 1.9 21 67 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 311
Write 212
Mixed 209
SusWrite 36.8
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 16.7
56% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 87.9
DQ Write 36.5
DQ Mixed 42.7
37% 55.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 61%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
85GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 321 319 314 317 317 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 483
Write 305
Mixed 298
SusWrite 318
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 55.9
4K Mixed 23.1
90% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 83.1
DQ Mixed 131
111% 168 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 76%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$105
302GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 97 96 95 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 111
Write 104
Mixed 71
SusWrite 96.3
70% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-198.A00LF KHX1866C10D3/8G 9905403-198.A00LF KHX1866C10D3/8G 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.2
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 10.7
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback