Alienware XPS 730X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive26.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAlienware XPS 730X  (all builds)
MotherboardDELL 0P270J
Memory0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120219
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 12 '20 at 22:31
Run Duration359 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 965-$1,244
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 96.9
1-Core 78
2-Core 155
68% 110 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 396
41% 332 Pts
64-Core 405
25% 405 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.9% Good
Lighting 80.1
Reflection 80.1
Parallax 70
65% 76.7 fps
MRender 72.4
Gravity 73.9
Splatting 76.8
61% 74.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4X11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 31 25 26 32 18 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.4% Poor
Read 119
Write 114
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 25.8
19% 86 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 23.3
4K Mixed 19.2
59% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 21.5
DQ Write 42
DQ Mixed 17.7
17% 27.1 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 101%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
138GB free
Firmware: ME0T
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 17 44 36 31 30 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.4% Below average
Read 117
Write 113
Mixed 108
SusWrite 26.4
20% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 22
72% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 22.9
DQ Write 42.5
DQ Mixed 31.6
24% 32.3 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 134%
Hitachi HDS72202 2TB
638GB free
Firmware: A20N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 90 92 82 96 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 59.3
Write 70.8
Mixed 44
SusWrite 92.1
49% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ABA3 3TB
535GB free
Firmware: ABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 119 124 105 137 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 152
Write 147
Mixed 32
SusWrite 127
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 90%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
94GB free
Firmware: SD35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 103 102 101 95 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 112
Write 35
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 93
55% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59%
Great: 66%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
104GB free
Firmware: 3B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 73 70 70 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 95.5
Write 93.7
Mixed 76
SusWrite 72.1
62% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 69%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
232GB free
Firmware: 0-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 24 70 71 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 33.3
Mixed 31
SusWrite 39.4
32% 42.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
556GB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 106 107 103 102 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 88.8
Write 102
Mixed 31
SusWrite 104
110% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 62%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
755GB free, PID 0100
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 67 62 66 69 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Read 45
Write 26.5
Mixed 5
SusWrite 65.7
47% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
15% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 44%
Sony MRW-E90 131GB
114GB free, PID 0bae
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 7.4 28 27 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.1% Poor
Read 115
Write 30
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 14.4
53% 50 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.8
188% 5.2 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 93%
Laufwerk 3TB
819GB free, PID d000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 21 20 21 32 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.1% Poor
Read 112
Write 116
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 25.6
90% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 1.03 MB/s
Laufwerk 3TB
416GB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 17 17 18 27 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.6% Poor
Read 107
Write 125
Mixed 47
SusWrite 22.1
96% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.4
84% 1 MB/s
Laufwerk 3TB
633GB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 17 17 18 27 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.8% Poor
Read 90.7
Write 103
Mixed 40
SusWrite 21.7
81% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 0.97 MB/s
Laufwerk 3TB
804GB free, PID d010
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 17 18 27 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.9% Poor
Read 128
Write 116
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 21.8
97% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 1.1 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 3 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 15.5
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 13.5
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 50.7
79% 50.7 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback