Alienware XPS 730X

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	63.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	26.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Alienware XPS 730X (all builds)
Motherboard	DELL 0P270J
Memory	0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120219
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '20 at 22:31
Run Duration	359 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 965-$1,244 1,602 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 96.9 1-Core 78 2-Core 155 68% 110 Pts	4-Core 267 8-Core 396 41% 332 Pts	64-Core 405 25% 405 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Lighting 80.1 Reflection 80.1 Parallax 70 65% 76.7 fps	MRender 72.4 Gravity 73.9 Splatting 76.8 61% 74.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4X11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 31 25 26 32 18 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.4% Poor	Read 119 Write 114 Mixed 85.8 SusWrite 25.8 19% 86 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 23.3 4K Mixed 19.2 59% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 21.5 DQ Write 42 DQ Mixed 17.7 17% 27.1 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 101%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 138GB free Firmware: ME0T SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 17 44 36 31 30 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.4% Below average	Read 117 Write 113 Mixed 108 SusWrite 26.4 20% 91.1 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 24.2 4K Mixed 22 72% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 22.9 DQ Write 42.5 DQ Mixed 31.6 24% 32.3 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 134%
Hitachi HDS72202 2TB 246 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 638GB free Firmware: A20N SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 90 92 82 96 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	43.5% Average	Read 59.3 Write 70.8 Mixed 44 SusWrite 92.1 49% 66.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ABA3 3TB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 535GB free Firmware: ABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 119 124 105 137 141 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Read 152 Write 147 Mixed 32 SusWrite 127 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 90%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750 12,067 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 94GB free Firmware: SD35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 103 102 101 95 86 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 112 Write 35 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 93 55% 74.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 66%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95 28,095 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 104GB free Firmware: 3B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 73 70 70 73 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 95.5 Write 93.7 Mixed 76 SusWrite 72.1 62% 84.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 69%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 232GB free Firmware: 0-10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 24 70 71 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Read 67.5 Write 33.3 Mixed 31 SusWrite 39.4 32% 42.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 1,602 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 556GB free, PID d011 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 106 107 103 102 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	41.6% Average	Read 88.8 Write 102 Mixed 31 SusWrite 104 110% 81.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 62%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 1,758 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 755GB free, PID 0100 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 67 62 66 69 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	Read 45 Write 26.5 Mixed 5 SusWrite 65.7 47% 35.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.1 15% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 44%
Sony MRW-E90 131GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 114GB free, PID 0bae Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 7.4 28 27 24 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.1% Poor	Read 115 Write 30 Mixed 40.8 SusWrite 14.4 53% 50 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 2.8 188% 5.2 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 93%
Laufwerk 3TB 819GB free, PID d000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 21 20 21 32 37 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.1% Poor	Read 112 Write 116 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 25.6 90% 72.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 87% 1.03 MB/s

Laufwerk 3TB 416GB free, PID d011 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 17 17 18 27 29 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.6% Poor	Read 107 Write 125 Mixed 47 SusWrite 22.1 96% 75.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.4 84% 1 MB/s

Laufwerk 3TB 633GB free, PID d011 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 17 17 18 27 30 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.8% Poor	Read 90.7 Write 103 Mixed 40 SusWrite 21.7 81% 63.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 84% 0.97 MB/s

Laufwerk 3TB 804GB free, PID d010 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 17 18 27 30 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.9% Poor	Read 128 Write 116 Mixed 51.8 SusWrite 21.8 97% 79.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 91% 1.1 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 3 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 15.5 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 13.5 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 50.7 79% 50.7 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Alienware XPS 730X

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)