Today's hottest deals

Asus P8Z77-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '20 at 11:01
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3225-$325
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 93.4
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 156
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 229
31% 230 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 20.2
18% 19.8 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 17.2
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 433 451 435 357 357 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 452
Mixed 423
SusWrite 399
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 63.7
4K Mixed 42.2
137% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 369
278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 103%
Great: 129%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 320GB-$59
298GB free
Firmware: GM3OA5BA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 82 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 78.2
Write 78.3
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 81.4
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5402-030.A01LF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.1% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 18.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.1
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-M Builds (Compare 1,320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $439
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback