Acer Aspire 1825PTZ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 1825PTZ  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JM12-MS-CAP
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100423
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 17 '20 at 18:40
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel U4100
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
25.9% Poor
Memory 46
1-Core 18.5
2-Core 36.9
24% 33.8 Pts
4-Core 36.5
8-Core 36.8
5% 36.7 Pts
64-Core 36
2% 36 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 0300)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.25% Terrible
Lighting 0.33
Reflection 0.31
Parallax 0.22
0% 0.29 fps
MRender 0.29
Gravity 0.33
Splatting 0.22
0% 0.28 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.25%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 35 32 30 32 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 65.7
Write 66.2
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 33.9
38% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 41%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.1 7.2 7.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
4.33% Terrible
Read 13.8
Write 6.7
Mixed 5
SusWrite 7.1
10% 8.15 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.33%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5673FH0-CH9 0443 RMT3020EF48E8W1333 4GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.6
12% 4.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 1825PTZ Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Acer Aspire 1825PTZ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback