Today's hottest deals

Alienware Aurora-R4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlienware Aurora-R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0FPV4P
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130822
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '20 at 05:48
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 205
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 357
46% 345 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 (192-bit)
Nvidia(10DE 106F) 1.5GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
21% Poor
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 25.6
Parallax 31.1
20% 27 fps
MRender 34.7
Gravity 29.2
Splatting 23.6
23% 29.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$46
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.ADA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 60 62 64 63 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 64.2
Write 68.6
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 60.8
43% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36%
Great: 42%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$150
1TB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 101 103 102 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 117
Write 109
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 101
70% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 70%
WD WD2000JD-00HBB0 200GB
21GB free
Firmware: 08.02D08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
5.88% Terrible
Read 8.5
Write 11.7
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 11.9
6% 8.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
27% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.88%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.9% Very good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 27.8
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.2
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R4 Builds (Compare 1,784 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora-R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback