Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 4205U 567 User benchmarks, average bench 40% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	24.2% Poor	Memory 33.8 1-Core 53.4 2-Core 64.9 31% 50.7 Pts	4-Core 87.5 8-Core 76.7 11% 82.1 Pts	64-Core 99.8 6% 99.8 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610 3,878 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 08CA) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7463 Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	1.71% Terrible	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 4.85 Parallax 3.41 0% 2.77 fps	MRender 5.95 Gravity 2.9 Splatting 8.26 5% 5.7 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.71% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 851GB free (System drive) Firmware: 100001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 19 21 15 17 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 121 Write 60.3 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 20.7 40% 55.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 51% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2666 C19 2x8GB 1,403 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.2% Average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 25.3 MC Mixed 19.3 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 6.8 17% 5.93 GB/s	Latency 233 17% 233 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	1,138x
UHD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 3,878 samples	262x
Radeon 520AMDBench 6%, 602 samples	25x

SSD
NVMe TOSHIBA 256GBKbg40zns256gBench 132%, 2,842 samples	69x
NVMe SK hynix 256GBBc501Bench 110%, 8,328 samples	66x
SN520 NVMe WDC 256GBPCBench 137%, 4,380 samples	37x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBUnknownBench 40%, 7,726 samples	253x
SF4641G8CK8IEHLSBG 1x8GBUnknownBench 40%, 5,660 samples	194x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBUnknownBench 41%, 10,071 samples	63x