Alaska A_M_I_

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlaska A_M_I_  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory12.4 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime2 Days
Run DateNov 19 '20 at 23:58
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core
, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Memory 88.3
1-Core 156
2-Core 303
99% 182 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 866
91% 729 Pts
64-Core 1152
71% 1152 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM01.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 41 37 39 43 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 83%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
210GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 377 373 381 380 374 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 447
Mixed 444
SusWrite 388
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 56.8
188% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2009)-$152
582GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 82 81 83 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 88
Write 82.5
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 82.3
56% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 47%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$34
769GB free
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 81 81 82 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 72.6
Write 76.4
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 80.8
47% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GP-ARS16G32 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 35.6
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 33.7
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A_M_I_ Builds (Compare 598 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Alaska A_M_I_

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback