HP ProBook 430 G1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 430 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1946
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190829
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '20 at 14:46
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 66.8
1-Core 42
2-Core 67.5
39% 58.8 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 134
17% 131 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1946) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 4
Parallax 5.47
3% 4.48 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 1.93
Splatting 6.48
4% 3.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1002YAM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 21 25 17 21 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 21
Write 60.9
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 23.9
23% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
42% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 61%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 17 20 12 8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 37.6
Write 30.5
Mixed 10.1
SusWrite 12.4
16% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
41% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP16D3LS1KBG/4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
26.7% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 430 G1 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 430 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback