Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180403
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateNov 21 '20 at 00:32
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 41%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 85
1-Core 119
2-Core 220
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 792
71% 597 Pts
64-Core 982
61% 982 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
Gigabyte(1458 37B1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 156
Parallax 162
132% 160 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 144
Splatting 105
112% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 120%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,194
Write 1,449
Mixed 1,501
380% 1,715 MB/s
4K Read 58.3
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 74.6
262% 93.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,002
DQ Write 1,090
DQ Mixed 1,152
838% 1,081 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 249GB
43GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 425 431 346 183 176 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 416
Mixed 419
SusWrite 324
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 48.8
167% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 274
229% 331 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 127%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
153GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 116 117 118 123 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 143
Write 157
Mixed 80
SusWrite 117
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
309GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 167 168 168 168 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 140
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 166
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR32GX4M4C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
66.3% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 21.2
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 19.6
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,035
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback