Today's hottest deals

Asus P7H55-M LX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics72.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P7H55-M LX  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '20 at 08:43
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 540-$60
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 77
2-Core 133
56% 93 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 191
25% 189 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Lighting 96
Reflection 86.4
Parallax 77.1
78% 86.5 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 79.5
Splatting 74.4
62% 75.2 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST31000524NS 1TB-$59
873GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 72 68 74 105 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 117
Write 89.5
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 77.3
61% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
193% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 75%
USB FLASH DRIVE 16GB
3GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
2.71% Terrible
Read 8
Write 3.3
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 4.6
7% 5.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.71%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
28.9% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 12
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55-M LX Builds (Compare 418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback