Asus TP500LB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus TP500LB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TP500LB
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '20 at 13:37
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5500U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 92
2-Core 150
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 247
33% 248 Pts
64-Core 252
16% 252 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 940M
Asus(1043 23BA) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5730
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
9.47% Terrible
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 10.8
10% 11.6 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 9.2
7% 8.97 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.47%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 428 411 446 300 291 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 454
Mixed 433
SusWrite 380
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 49.4
169% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 315
241% 327 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 110%
Great: 129%
Kingston RBU-SMSM151S324GD 24GB
20GB free
Firmware: S9FM01B9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 64 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 292
Write 87.8
Mixed 169
SusWrite 65
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 66.7
4K Mixed 19.6
111% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 8.3
38% 86.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
36.5% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 9.9
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 11.7
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TP500LB Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TP500LB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback