Acer Aspire ES1-523

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire ES1-523  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer TRICERA_CZL
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160727
Uptime11.2 Days
Run DateNov 27 '20 at 16:01
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7310 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 58.2
1-Core 27.6
2-Core 63.8
33% 49.9 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 117
16% 119 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4
Acer(1025 108A) 1GB
CLim: 7410 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.1
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
1.02% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 3.2
0% 2.3 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.02%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
605GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1P5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 71 50 72 67 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 54.1
Write 74.7
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 69
41% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
103% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 62%
FSPEED 2000GB 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 7.2 5.6 5.3 7.2 7.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
8.81% Terrible
Read 20.7
Write 17.2
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 6.6
17% 13.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
86% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 8.81%
Great: 13%
FSPENND 2000G 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 2.8 4.4 5 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
5.06% Terrible
Read 21.1
Write 19.2
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 5.8
14% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
14% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.06%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1L16BC4R1-BQSS 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 5.7
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 7
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire ES1-523 Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire ES1-523

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback