| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 55.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180803 |
| Uptime | 1.3 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 03 '20 at 01:51 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 24% |
PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-7640X-$66
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
|
71.7%
Very good
|
82% 146 Pts
|
51% 404 Pts
|
28% 447 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
131%
Outstanding
|
143% 176 fps
|
129% 162 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$229
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 286 239 189 173 163 MB/s
|
102%
Outstanding
|
86% 384 MB/s
|
174% 63 MB/s
|
271% 362 MB/s
|
|
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 112 109 118 118 118 MB/s
|
50.4%
Above average
|
68% 92.7 MB/s
|
59% 0.57 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CMW64GX4M4C3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
71.9%
Very good
|
73% 25.6 GB/s
|
62% 21.7 GB/s
|
50% 79.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,681 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7800XIntel $206Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 501x |
| Core i7-7820XIntel $195Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 265x |
| Core i7-7740XIntel $130Bench 87%, 5,094 samples | 150x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 170x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 153x |
| RTX 2080-TiNvidia $365Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 97x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $798 |