Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E6540 106 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	34.5% Below average	Memory 62.1 1-Core 21.6 2-Core 42.3 30% 42 Pts	4-Core 42.6 8-Core 43.2 6% 42.9 Pts	64-Core 42.7 3% 42.7 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670 21,442 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sapphire(174B 1622) 1GB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.3000 Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	2.93% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 4.9 Parallax 3 3% 3.8 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 3.2 Splatting 4.9 3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.93% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3160215AS 160GB-$32 6,007 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AAC SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 69 70 74 73 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	42.1% Average	Read 76.4 Write 75.5 Mixed 40.3 SusWrite 70.2 48% 65.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 41%
ST950032 5AS 500GB 281 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 60GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 22 19 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 28.8 Write 23.1 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 20.7 30% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 2.8 9% 3 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.97 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 23%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium Dual E2140Intel $80Bench 31%, 2,489 samples	5x
Pentium Dual E2160Intel $47Bench 32%, 4,697 samples	3x
Core2 6300Intel $40Bench 34%, 5,234 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples	3x
GeForce 7300 SENvidiaBench 0%, 1,208 samples	3x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	2x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x
S400 120GBEzcoolBench 57%, 487 samples	1x

Value: 35% - Below average

Total price: $108