Asus P5VD2-VM SE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5VD2-VM SE  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '20 at 21:05
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E6540
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
34.5% Below average
Memory 62.1
1-Core 21.6
2-Core 42.3
30% 42 Pts
4-Core 42.6
8-Core 43.2
6% 42.9 Pts
64-Core 42.7
3% 42.7 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
Sapphire(174B 1622) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.3000
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
2.93% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 3
3% 3.8 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 4.9
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.93%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160215AS 160GB-$32
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 69 70 74 73 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 76.4
Write 75.5
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 70.2
48% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 41%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
60GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 22 19 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 23.1
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 20.7
30% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.8
9% 3 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5VD2-VM SE Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5VD2-VM SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $108
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback