Acer Aspire E1-572G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-572G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_HW
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131121
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 06 '20 at 20:23
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 93.2
1-Core 73.5
2-Core 129
62% 98.5 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 176
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 0775) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3355
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.7% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 5.6
3% 3.6 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 2
Splatting 4
3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.7%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$59
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 43 66 25 50 3.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 352
Write 298
Mixed 273
SusWrite 63.4
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 11.6
49% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 30.7
DQ Write 22.2
DQ Mixed 32.6
23% 28.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1NBG/4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
32.3% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 9.4
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-572G Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-572G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback