Today's hottest deals

HC HCAR357-MI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHC HCAR357-MI  (all builds)
MotherboardHC HCAR357-MI
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '20 at 00:35
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 216
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 545
50% 417 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
9.85% Terrible
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 19.7
10% 14.4 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 14.7
Splatting 12.1
9% 11 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.85%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM128GDJTNG-83A0A 128GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80000C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 187 186 186 185 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 1,002
Write 305
Mixed 586
SusWrite 191
115% 521 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 52.1
187% 68.2 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 277
202% 263 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 121%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB8GS2400.C8JT 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
44.3% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 12.9
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HCAR357-MI Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HC HCAR357-MI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback