QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory13.7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 13.7GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory6.9 GB free of 13.6719 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '20 at 04:06
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 67
1-Core 120
2-Core 214
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 340
44% 331 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Asus(1043 877E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile)
46.2% Average
Lighting 85.9
Reflection 85.7
Parallax 79.2
70% 83.6 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 86GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,630
Write 9,095
Mixed 7,130
1,712% 7,618 MB/s
4K Read 638
4K Write 484
4K Mixed 609
2,004% 577 MB/s
DQ Read 664
DQ Write 615
DQ Mixed 626
474% 635 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 60%
Qemu HARDDISK 500GB
169GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,978
Write 6,830
Mixed 5,261
1,279% 5,690 MB/s
4K Read 673
4K Write 576
4K Mixed 600
2,094% 616 MB/s
DQ Read 704
DQ Write 666
DQ Mixed 670
507% 680 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x13GB
1 of 1 slots used
13GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
72.3% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 23.8
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 21.8
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback