Intel W2600CR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel W2600CR  (all builds)
Memory29.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '20 at 01:15
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0-$1,335
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 190
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 717
64% 543 Pts
64-Core 919
57% 919 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Gainward(10B0 1189) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1527 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
29.3% Poor
Lighting 33.5
Reflection 35.4
Parallax 45.2
27% 38 fps
MRender 46.9
Gravity 41.8
Splatting 35.4
33% 41.4 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 265 180 180 121 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 439
Write 337
Mixed 248
SusWrite 195
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 22.5
80% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 91.5
DQ Mixed 124
108% 166 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 86%
Intel MegaSR 999GB
844GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 127 127 126 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 134
Write 123
Mixed 96.5
SusWrite 126
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
215% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965516-052.B00LF 9965516-052.B00LF 9965516-070.A00LF 9965516-070.A00LF 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.4% Average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W2600CR Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Intel W2600CR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback