Asus P8H61-M2/TPM/SI R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M2/TPM/SI R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140706
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateDec 12 '20 at 20:23
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 174
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 335
45% 337 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
Asus(1043 835C) 768MB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 920 MHz, Ram: 768MB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 14
Reflection 24.9
Parallax 13.6
11% 17.5 fps
MRender 20.2
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 13.2
13% 16.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 137 137 136 133 135 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.8% Above average
Read 242
Write 149
Mixed 182
SusWrite 134
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 28.9
101% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 121
104% 153 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 82%
Transcend SSD220 240GB-$38
98GB free
Firmware: S0130B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 48 48 48 46 46 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.2% Average
Read 256
Write 227
Mixed 231
SusWrite 60.1
43% 194 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 20.5
88% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 35
70% 143 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 93%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
228GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 54 55 54 55 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 44.4
Write 48
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 53.8
34% 45.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 16GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 9.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M2/TPM/SI R2.0 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M2/TPM/SI R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $907
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback