Alienware Aurora-R3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAlienware Aurora-R3  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 046MHW
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '20 at 04:45
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$171
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 94.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 202
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 518
56% 444 Pts
64-Core 524
32% 524 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 18.8
15% 18.5 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 18.6
Splatting 17
14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ARRAY0 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 46 13 45 41 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48% Average
Read 127
Write 149
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 39.2
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.7
180% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48%
Great: 113%
ARRAY1 68GB
63GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 47 63 45 44 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 50.8
Write 79.1
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 48.3
48% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.9
99% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
58% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 17.9
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 18.5
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 58%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R3 Builds (Compare 334 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Alienware Aurora-R3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $599
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback