Today's hottest deals

Asus Pro WS C621-64L SAGE-10G Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus Pro WS C621-64L SAGE-10G Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Pro WS C621-64L SAGE-10G Series
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '20 at 04:04
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6134M
CPU1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 78.6
1-Core 117
2-Core 233
79% 143 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 893
81% 680 Pts
64-Core 1,192
74% 1,192 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
135% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 171
Parallax 340
139% 227 fps
MRender 283
Gravity 124
Splatting 174
155% 193 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 135%
Great: 153%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M9PeG 256GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 235 207 232 260 257 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,568
Write 1,026
Mixed 983
SusWrite 241
212% 954 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 58.9
199% 69.6 MB/s
DQ Read 764
DQ Write 463
DQ Mixed 594
448% 607 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 166%
Great: 205%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GR7AFR8N-VK 1x16GB
1 of 12 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.3% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 9.4
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 9
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro WS C621-64L SAGE-10G Series Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO

System: Asus Pro WS C621-64L SAGE-10G Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback