MSI MS-16J9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GP62M 7RD
MotherboardMSI MS-16J9  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '20 at 10:16
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 84
2-Core 200
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 391
51% 382 Pts
64-Core 393
24% 393 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 11C8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 26.20.100.7263
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.63% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 7.1
5% 7.2 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 6
Splatting 1.3
4% 5.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.63%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk Ultra 3D NVMe 250GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 274 218 219 217 218 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 1,078
Write 848
Mixed 813
SusWrite 245
166% 746 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 33.5
182% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 678
DQ Write 866
DQ Mixed 572
487% 706 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 146%
Great: 199%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
914GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 122 126 124 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 128
Write 118
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 123
71% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
90% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC Kingston 99U5700-028.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.8% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 24.1
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 23.2
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J9 Builds (Compare 3,785 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback