Gigabyte GA-Z270N-WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z270N-WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270N-WIFI  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '17 at 02:12
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Memory 97.5
1-Core 147
2-Core 293
99% 179 Pts
4-Core 579
8-Core 585
78% 582 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 99%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B0) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (71 fps cap detected)
57.5% Above average
Lighting 70.9
Reflection 70.4
Parallax 61.5
58% 67.6 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 66.8
Splatting 69.9
57% 69.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 414
Mixed 422
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 28.4
168% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 48.9
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 28.1
63% 122 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 102%
Great: 122%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
111% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 187
Mixed 167
138% 184 MB/s
4K Read 1.16
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.25
114% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 178
Mixed 157
128% 170 MB/s
4K Read 1.14
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.16
102% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 30.5
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 33.1
92% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 48.3
83% 48.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270N-WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 272 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270N-WIFI - $339

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $984
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback