Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac18,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple iMac18,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-77F17D7DA9285301
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display4096 x 2304 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '20 at 17:50
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 214
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 338
49% 360 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 560
Apple(106B 016A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 907 MHz, MLim: 1280 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.30.01.53
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.28% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 28.4
0% 13.7 fps
MRender 20.4
Gravity 22
Splatting 15.3
15% 19.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 5.28%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple HDD HTS541010A9E632 1TB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0AB5N0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 21 13 22 17 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.65% Terrible
Read 11.7
Write 17.5
Mixed 8.2
SusWrite 18.5
10% 14 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
13% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 8.65%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x344154463531323634485A2D3247334232202020 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.2% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 18.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac18,2 Builds (Compare 198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac18,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback