Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics73% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCisco UCSC-C220-M3S  (all builds)
MotherboardCisco UCSC-C220-M3S
Memory51.2 GB free of 56 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '21 at 11:17
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 132
55% 90.6 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 448
46% 371 Pts
64-Core 558
34% 558 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Gigabyte(1458 4014) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73% Very good
Lighting 91.8
Reflection 91
Parallax 83.6
75% 88.8 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 78.9
Splatting 72.1
70% 87.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI UCSC-RAID2008M8i 999GB
813GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 67 103 106 110 107 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.2% Good
Read 114
Write 114
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 95.5
69% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M393B1K70DH0-YH9 7x8GB
7 of 16 slots used
56GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.5% Good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 23.9
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.5
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback