Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive17.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2H  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150422
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateJan 11 '21 at 01:58
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Memory 46.5
1-Core 16.1
2-Core 53.7
25% 38.8 Pts
4-Core 75.7
8-Core 73.3
10% 74.5 Pts
64-Core 69.7
4% 69.7 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 84F5) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.24% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 7.1
5% 7.4 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 6.9
5% 6.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.24%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 60 31 131 24 54 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.3% Very poor
Read 63
Write 90.8
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 72.7
17% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 8.2
32% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 9.3
DQ Write 16.6
DQ Mixed 11.8
9% 12.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 1600 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/ 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
20.4% Poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 8.6
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 7.2
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-DS2H Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $14
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback