Google Compute Engine

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory156GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 156GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGoogle Compute Engine  (all builds)
MotherboardGoogle Google Compute Engine
Memory152.3 GB free of 156 GB
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '17 at 20:46
Run Duration54 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 73.8
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 175
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 688
59% 506 Pts
64-Core 1,436
89% 1,436 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 67%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Google PersistentDisk 537GB
486GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 156GB
null MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 12288 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82% Excellent
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 28.3
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 13.7
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 93
43% 93 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 82%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compute Engine Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: Google Compute Engine

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback