Today's hottest deals

Medion Erazer X5747 D/B605

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedion Erazer X5747 D/B605  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI Z97 GAMING 7 (MS-7916)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateJan 11 '21 at 18:42
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 89.7
1-Core 124
2-Core 253
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 654
68% 548 Pts
64-Core 630
39% 630 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 145
Parallax 228
111% 170 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 138
Splatting 97.4
94% 118 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 105%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SHSS37A480G 480GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.r
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 333 246 372 205 383 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 483
Mixed 310
SusWrite 306
90% 403 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 40.4
154% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 68.7
130% 259 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
WD Green 5TB (2014)-$170
4.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 161 163 163 163 166 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 146
Mixed 99.1
SusWrite 163
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 97%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
272GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 99 99 99 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 108
Write 100
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 98.9
123% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.8% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 16.5
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 20.6
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Erazer X5747 D/B605 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Medion Erazer X5747 D/B605

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $963
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback