Today's hottest deals

Acer TravelMate P643-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer TravelMate P643-V  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer TravelMate P643-V
Memory3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '21 at 15:57
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2370M-$272
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 62.6
2-Core 82.3
47% 72.2 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 160
22% 161 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 0733) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
1.91% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.5
2% 1.93 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.91%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$34
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 47 34 30 25 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 71
Write 71
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 33.7
41% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 13.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate P643-V Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P643-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $307
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback