Supermicro 59102100100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro 59102100100  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+
Memory68 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191120
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 12 '21 at 20:16
Run Duration401 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2673 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 70.2
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 206
66% 120 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 791
70% 591 Pts
64-Core 1,997
124% 1,997 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2151 872 804 804 805 803 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,779
Write 1,702
Mixed 1,414
SusWrite 1,040
333% 1,484 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 71.1
192% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 633
DQ Write 539
DQ Mixed 590
441% 587 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 223%
Great: 340%
IBM ServeRAID M5110 499GB
220GB free
Firmware: 3.46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 550 502 502 503 390 274 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
159% Outstanding
Read 1611
Write 1,599
Mixed 1,614
SusWrite 454
296% 1,319 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 51.4
173% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 279
211% 282 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 159%
Great: 169%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 898GB
472GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 296 297 297 297 298 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1,473
Write 1,693
Mixed 1,288
SusWrite 300
266% 1,189 MB/s
4K Read 59.8
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 43.4
170% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 222
169% 228 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 139%
Great: 123%
IBM ServeRAID M5110 238GB
133GB free
Firmware: 3.46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 129 116 107 89 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
142% Outstanding
Read 1638
Write 1,603
Mixed 1,614
SusWrite 116
278% 1,243 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 55.4
182% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 283
214% 286 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 142%
Great: 183%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
926GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 172 172 171 171 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 119
Write 152
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 170
85% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
373% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
448GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 65 64 74 67 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 75.3
Write 74.9
Mixed 48
SusWrite 69.2
49% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 43%
USB 2.0 Flash Disk 4GB
0GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29.1
Write 21.2
Mixed 18.7
28% 23 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
40% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT8GC72B4NB1NK-CG Samsung M393B5170EH1-CH9 Samsung M393B1K70CHD-CH9 Micron 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F Samsung M393B1K70CHD-CH9 Samsung M393B5170EH1-CH9 NT8GC72B4NB1NK-CG Samsung M393B5170EH1-CH9 Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 Sam... 96GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.4% Very good
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 28.6
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 5.7
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 59102100100 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro 59102100100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $283
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback