Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-1719x

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GX701
MotherboardMSI MS-1719x  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080812
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateJan 15 '21 at 13:10
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T5750-$99
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Memory 74.8
1-Core 21.1
2-Core 38.4
34% 44.8 Pts
4-Core 25.3
8-Core 21.2
3% 23.2 Pts
64-Core 40
2% 40 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 38%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK2552GSX 250GB-$49
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LV010J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 23 35 37 38 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 8.8
Write 17.9
Mixed 15
SusWrite 29.2
13% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
58% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 31%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 2GB
0GB free, PID 0000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 21
Write 3.7
Mixed 4.4
9% 9.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.3
8% 2.93 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.1 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1719x Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1719x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback