MSI MS-17F2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GF75 Thin 9RCX
MotherboardMSI MS-17F2  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191031
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 17 '21 at 02:19
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 165
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 543
53% 436 Pts
64-Core 675
42% 675 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
MSI(1462 1283) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6109
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Lighting 40
Reflection 48.1
Parallax 38.4
33% 42.2 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 41.2
Splatting 27
28% 35.6 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1032 512GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20140000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,065
Write 1,139
Mixed 963
236% 1,056 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 97.7
4K Mixed 53.1
178% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 762
DQ Write 570
DQ Mixed 653
492% 661 MB/s
Poor: 107% Great: 204%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
220GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 61 64 63 64 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 67.3
Write 50
Mixed 40
SusWrite 63.2
41% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 57%
USB 320GB
294GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 17 6.2 5 15 5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 26.2
Write 16
Mixed 18
SusWrite 8.8
13% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
36% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
43.3% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 11.2
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.8
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17F2 Builds (Compare 709 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17F2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback