Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '21 at 22:14
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 190
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 699
63% 529 Pts
64-Core 695
43% 695 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
PowerColor(148C 2342) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.3
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Lighting 69.5
Reflection 75.3
Parallax 89.1
57% 78 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 63.2
Splatting 47.2
47% 59 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 55%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda Q1 SSD ZA480CV10001 480GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STWSH012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 439 436 389 445 444 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 369
Write 442
Mixed 366
SusWrite 432
91% 402 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 27.4
95% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 166
146% 216 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-067.A KHX1600C9D3/4 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.1% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 10.7
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,996 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback