Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109 39,897 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	38.5% Below average	Memory 64 1-Core 37.4 2-Core 68.2 38% 56.5 Pts	4-Core 78.4 8-Core 80.2 11% 79.3 Pts	64-Core 78.8 5% 78.8 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% PNY(196E 11D9) 3GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.6% Above average	Lighting 64.4 Reflection 66.7 Parallax 61.3 52% 64.1 fps	MRender 66.3 Gravity 66.8 Splatting 61.9 53% 65 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SDSA5GK-016G-1006 16GB 198 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 15GB free Firmware: CS.54.06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 43 46 48 50 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Read 167 Write 52.5 Mixed 59 SusWrite 45.1 18% 80.8 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 9.9 4K Mixed 7 31% 9.4 MB/s	DQ Read 11.8 DQ Write 8.8 DQ Mixed 8.2 7% 9.6 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 27%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 655GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 10 12 12 14 22 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 50% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.9% Very poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 5.1 17% 5.83 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.4 13% 4.57 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	129x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	27x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	26x

GPU
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	62x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	44x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	25x

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $137