HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory1.5 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120418
Uptime24.5 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '21 at 18:48
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 B24
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
45.4% Average
Memory 78.4
1-Core 41.5
2-Core 80.1
45% 66.7 Pts
4-Core 74.1
8-Core 83.1
10% 78.6 Pts
64-Core 81.5
5% 81.5 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4200
HP(103C 3047) 368MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
0.93% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.4
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 0.4
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.93%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mb1000cb ZQE 1TB
718GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPG1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 25 20 9.8 9.3 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 39.9
Write 21.9
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 16.3
21% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
58% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:04 43 RMR1870EF48E8W133 ID:04 43 RMR1870EF48E8W133 ID:04 43 RMR1870EF48E8W133 ID:04 43 RMR1870EF48E8W133 41GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.8% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 10.3
26% 9.03 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.7
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback