QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '21 at 22:45
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 12-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 78.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 242
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 771
77% 625 Pts
64-Core 1,012
63% 1,012 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$150
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.2.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 144
Parallax 197
115% 161 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 142
Splatting 96
95% 118 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 107%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 128GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,933
Write 1,740
Mixed 1,914
485% 2,196 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 33.8
118% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 234
164% 207 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 68%
WDS500G3XHC-00SJG0 500GB
307GB free
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2244 1643 1639 1646 1608 1632 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
310% Outstanding
Read 2,776
Write 3,201
Mixed 2,100
SusWrite 1,735
552% 2,453 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 52.9
191% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 857
DQ Write 705
DQ Mixed 774
582% 779 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 310%
Great: 288%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x12GB
1 of 1 slots used
12GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 42.1
MC Mixed 36.4
115% 40.4 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 33.5
94% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 110%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback