Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 90 1-Core 112 2-Core 229 81% 144 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 542 54% 438 Pts	64-Core 572 35% 572 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 375A) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.7% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 5.3 Parallax 4.8 4% 4.8 fps	MRender 6.1 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5 4% 5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.7% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0105A SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 93 47 73 46 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 469 Write 399 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 121 56% 254 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 14.4 4K Mixed 0.9 52% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 179 DQ Write 6.8 DQ Mixed 12.9 30% 66.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 100%
WD WD10JUCT-63J6SY0 1TB 3,317 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 762GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 110 111 111 112 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Read 111 Write 100 Mixed 54.3 SusWrite 110 69% 94 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown W642GU44J9266NC 1x16GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.5% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 10.3 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 10.7 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 67.3 60% 67.3 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16