ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Radiant
Motherboard	Intel DQ77MK
Memory	6.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181025
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '21 at 16:32
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1245 3,302 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	70% Very good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 93.9 2-Core 181 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 423 46% 362 Pts	64-Core 443 27% 443 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 2978) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Lighting 63.5 Reflection 77.2 Parallax 66.8 52% 69.2 fps	MRender 69.1 Gravity 66.2 Splatting 59.8 53% 65 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 250GB SSD 2,686 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900E13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 189 156 161 309 173 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 287 Write 114 Mixed 194 SusWrite 201 44% 199 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 33.5 4K Mixed 20 80% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 70.9 DQ Mixed 148 94% 108 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 105%
Toshiba MK7559GSXF 750GB 1,514 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 682GB free Firmware: GQ006B SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 96 96 97 98 98 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 96.2 Write 96.2 Mixed 45.7 SusWrite 94.9 61% 83.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4JTF25664AZ-1G6E1 4JTF25664AZ-1G6E1 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.2% Average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 12.1 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 12.9 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback