Acer AOA150

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer AOA150  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer
Memory0.9 GB free of 1.5 GB @ 0.5 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081006
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '21 at 19:14
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N270
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Memory 33.4
1-Core 4.9
2-Core 5.9
13% 14.7 Pts
4-Core 8.8
8-Core 9.3
1% 9.05 Pts
64-Core 6.7
0% 6.7 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543216L9A300 160GB-$99
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FB2OC40C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 11 14 10 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.62% Terrible
Read 19.4
Write 18.7
Mixed 17.3
SusWrite 14.1
13% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
32% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.62%
Great: 35%
USB DISK Pro 4GB
2GB free, PID 3623
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.2 3.3 4.7 4.9 5.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Read 9.4
Write 4
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 4
6% 4.97 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
21% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1GB
null MHz
512, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
7.03% Terrible
MC Read 2.1
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2.1
6% 2.27 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 0.9
4% 1.37 GB/s
Latency 235
17% 235 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.03%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback