Asus PN40

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus PN40  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PN40
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '21 at 17:21
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4000
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Memory 36.3
1-Core 51.4
2-Core 85.3
33% 57.7 Pts
4-Core 99.1
8-Core 103
13% 101 Pts
64-Core 71.9
4% 71.9 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Asus(1043 875E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.71% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 1.8
2% 2.17 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.71%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG Gammix S11 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 223 246 247 242 249 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 517
Write 244
Mixed 297
SusWrite 235
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 22.3
90% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 259
201% 277 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 75%
Great: 258%
Realtek RTL9210B NVME 512GB
142GB free
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 278 313 298 303 309 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 145
Write 271
Mixed 156
SusWrite 292
49% 216 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 13.9
53% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 108
83% 113 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Toshiba 9905711-015.A00G 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 6.1
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 220
18% 220 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PN40 Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus PN40

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback